﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</title>
    <description>Philadelphia Personal Injury Law is edited by attorney Jamie Sheller of the Philadelphia personal injury law firm Sheller, Ludwig and, Badey, P.C. and focuses on car and truck accidents, consumer class action, defective products, defective medical devices and defective drugs.</description>
    <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/</link>
    <atom:link href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Portable Headphones Can Cause Interference With Cardiac Devices</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;According to a recent study published in the journal Heart Rhythm, the magnets in portable headphones may cause temporary malfunction of some cardiac devices.  Therefore, the researchers suggest that patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or pacemakers should not place headphones from MP3 players too close to their chests.  The interference that can be caused by the headphones includes inhibition of tachyarrhythmia detection in ICDs and asynchronous pacing in pacemakers.  Patients with these devices don't need to avoid portable headphones, they should just keep them at least 3 centimeters (1.2 inches) from their chests.  Cardiac arrhythmia specialists have long told patients not to place electronic equipment directly over their devices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the study's researchers, the FDA has already concluded that digital music players are unlikely to interfere with implanted devices, but not much was known about potential interference from portable headphones.  In the recent study, electromagnetic levels from portable headphones exceeded levels sufficient to disable sensing in an implanted device, when the headphones were less than 2 centimeters from the chest.  Most of the devices returned to normal functioning once the headphones were moved away.  Patients with ICDs were more likely to have an interaction, than patients with pacemakers.  The headphones' magnetic fields were the same whether the MP3 player was turned on, or the headphones were plugged in. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/portable-headphones-can-cause-interference-with-cardiac-devices.aspx?googleid=272442"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/portable-headphones-can-cause-interference-with-cardiac-devices.aspx?googleid=272442</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:11:24 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Safety Alert for Zoll Defibrillators</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sudden heart stoppage, known as cardiac arrest, affects between 250,000 and 450,000 Americans each year.  Defibrillators are used to try and restore normal heart rhythm by delivering a shock.  Recently, Zoll Medical Corp. issued an alert regarding its AED Plus external defibrillators.  Due to defective batteries and software that fails to detect battery problems, the &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601202&amp;amp;sid=aWFEJ8SAtRQA&amp;amp;refer=healthcare"&gt;Zoll defibrillators &lt;/a&gt;may fail to deliver shocks.  Two patient deaths have been linked to such failures.  The Zoll defibrillators in question are used in public places such as airports, health clubs and schools.  Sudden heart stoppage can be caused several things, including silent coronary artery disease and heart rhythm disturbance.  The survival rate for sudden heart stoppage averages between 5 and 7 percent in the U.S.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/safety-alert-for-zoll-defibrillators.aspx?googleid=260582"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/safety-alert-for-zoll-defibrillators.aspx?googleid=260582</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FDA Gets Scolded By Public Citizen Over Baxter Pumps</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The FDA has recently come under fire from a consumer watchdog group.  &lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/business/2009/03/12/D96SOL7G0_baxter_fda_recall/index.html"&gt;Public Citizen expressed anger at the FDA &lt;/a&gt;for its delay in evaluating the latest problems with Baxter International's infusion pumps.  The pumps are used to deliver intravenous fluids and medicine to patients.  Baxter sent a letter to customers in January, warning that its Colleague Infusion pumps could shutdown and overheat.  Such problems are potentially fatal.  Over six weeks after Baxter issued the warning letter, the FDA classified the announcement as a Class I recall, the agency's most severe warning.  Though it is a serious warning, the Class I recall is not the same as a mandatory device recall, and therefore the Baxter pumps are not being pulled from the market. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to Public Citizen, Baxter's Colleague pumps have been linked to 19 deaths, and have been the subject of seven FDA Class I recalls since 2005.  Baxter claims that it stopped selling the pumps in the U.S. in 2005, but that 200,000 of the devices are still in use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-gets-scolded-by-public-citizen-over-baxter-pumps.aspx?googleid=259340"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-gets-scolded-by-public-citizen-over-baxter-pumps.aspx?googleid=259340</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Synthes Components Recalled</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Recently, Synthes, a Swiss medical device company, voluntarily recalled its Synex II Central Body components.  According to the company, all surgeons and hospitals with the recalled devices were to immediately stop implanting them.  The FDA has &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE5A34DN20091104"&gt;classified the recall as a Class I&lt;/a&gt;, which means that they could pose an imminent health hazard. The Synthes devices are used to replace damaged or unstable vertebral body in the T1-L5 portion of the spine.  The recall was issued after &lt;a href="http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm190330.htm"&gt;reports of device failure &lt;/a&gt;causing loss of vertebral body replacement height.  Those problems could lead to neural injury, increased pain and possible need for further surgery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/synthes-components-recalled.aspx?googleid=274662"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/synthes-components-recalled.aspx?googleid=274662</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recall of Defibrillators</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Certain models of the HeartStart FR2+ brand of automated external defibrillator (AED), manufactured by Phillips, have been recalled.  Recently, the voluntary recall was announced by the FDA.  According to the FDA, the AEDs have a memory chip failure that can cause the device not to work.  The AED is supposed to alert the defibrillator user when the patient needs a life saving shock.  The AED determines when a shock is necessary by automatically analyzing the patient's heart rhythm.  Between mid-2007 and early 2008, the memory chip failed some self-tests done by Phillips.  There are no reported injuries from failed memory chips.  Phillips will provide replacements for the &lt;a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/ProductAlert/DevicesandVaccines/16319"&gt;recalled AEDs&lt;/a&gt;.  The recalled AED models are the M3860A and M3861A, distributed by Phillips, and models M3840A and M3841A distributed by Laerdal Medical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/recall-of-defibrillators.aspx?googleid=272438"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/recall-of-defibrillators.aspx?googleid=272438</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fetal Monitors With Inaccurate Readings</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The FDA has notified doctors and hospitals of reports that some Philips Avalon Fetal Monitors are producting &lt;a href="http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm181505.htm"&gt;inaccurate readings&lt;/a&gt;, most often during the second stage of labor.  Philips issued an Important Device Safety Alert on September 4, 2009.  If the inaccurate readings are not recognized and addressed, doctors may be unaware of fetal distress or may recommend unnecessary interventions based on false information.  In order to avoid serious injuries, doctors must recognize the conditions and respond appropriately.  The affected models are the FM20, FM30, FM40 and FM50 with the ultrasound transducer. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fetal-monitors-with-inaccurate-readings.aspx?googleid=271264"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fetal-monitors-with-inaccurate-readings.aspx?googleid=271264</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:41:41 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Guilty Pleas in Bone Cement Case</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In June 2009, Synthes, its Norial Corp. unit and four executives were indicted in federal court in Philadelphia.  Synthes, based in West Chester, PA, is the world's largest maker of bone-related medical devices.  The government alleges that the company and its executives were involved in a conspiracy to hold &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/21/business/21bone.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=todayspaper"&gt;unauthorized clinical trials of Norial XR and Norian SRS &lt;/a&gt;bone cement.  According to the indictment, despite knowing the risks of these bone cement products, the company and its executives bypassed the FDA approval process for clinical trials.  During the unauthorized trials, three patients died from a rapid drop in blood pressure during surgery.  Recently, two of the indicted Synthes executives pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of shipping misbranded Norial XR across state lines.  The potential penalties include up to one year in prison and a $100,000 fine. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you or a family member had Norian bone cement used during a procedure, contact &lt;a href="http://www.sheller.com/"&gt;Sheller, P.C.&lt;/a&gt; to discuss whether you have a legal claim. Sheller, P.C. represents individuals and classes of individuals who have suffered a range of injuries.  Sheller lawyers have successfully represented people who have been injured by prescription drugs and medical devices.  Contact us to discuss your potential claim. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/guilty-pleas-in-bone-cement-case.aspx?googleid=267660"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/guilty-pleas-in-bone-cement-case.aspx?googleid=267660</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did Some Medical-Device Makers Pay Kickbacks To Surgeons?</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;According to recently unsealed federal lawsuits filed in Texas, several medical-device makers paid &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124769623201347809.html?ru=MKTW"&gt;kickbacks&lt;/a&gt; to have their products used.  The claims were made by former employees of the companies, who allege that heart surgeons were paid to use certain devices to treat atrial fibrillation,which a heart-rhythm defect in which blood pools inside the heart.  It can lead to stroke.  In surgical ablation, surgeons use devices that emit radiofrequencies to correct the heartbeat.  At least four companies are named in the lawsuits, including Medtronic Inc., Boston Scientific Corp., St. Jude Medical Inc., and AtriCure Inc.  Though the lawsuits were filed in 2007, a federal judge in Texas only recently unsealed them.  The allegations in the lawsuits are related to a US Justice Dept. inquiry in Texas.  The lawsuits allege that the medical-device companies engaged in a &amp;quot;fraudulent marketing and inducement campaign&amp;quot; in which Medicare was excessively billed due to kickbacks to doctors and hospitals.  The plaintiff in the case against Boston Scentific is a former saleswoman who claims that after she complained about illegal practices, she was fired.  This woman is also a plaintiff in cases against Medtronic and AtriCure, alleging that surgical ablation equipment was improperly marketed for use in treating atrial fibrillation, despite the lack of FDA approval for that use.  Federal law prohibits companies from marketing their products or medical devices for unapproved uses, even though doctors can use some products for off-label use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/did-some-medicaldevice-makers-pay-kickbacks-to-surgeons.aspx?googleid=267356"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/did-some-medicaldevice-makers-pay-kickbacks-to-surgeons.aspx?googleid=267356</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:47:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Medtronic Recalls Insulin Infusion Device</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An insulin infusion device used with an insulin pump was recently voluntarily recalled by its maker. According to Medtronic, the device can cause serious injury or death, due to a mechanical malfunction that could prevent proper air ventilation, causing either too much or too little insulin to be delivered. Medtronic says that about 60,000 of its &lt;a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/ProductAlert/DevicesandVaccines/15034"&gt;Quick-set infusion &lt;/a&gt;sets are involved in the recall. The Quick-set infusion sets are used wth MiniMed Pardigm insulin pumps. The affected devices have reference numbers MMT-396, MMT-397, MMT-398 and MMT-399, with lot numbers starting with &amp;quot;8.&amp;quot; Consumers can locate the lot numbers on the box and on individual infusion packaging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/medtronic-recalls-insulin-infusion-device.aspx?googleid=266878"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/medtronic-recalls-insulin-infusion-device.aspx?googleid=266878</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Synthes Executives Indicted For Improper Marketing</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The United States Attorney in Philadelphia has &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/business/17device.html?_r=1"&gt;indicted Synthes Inc&lt;/a&gt;. and four of its executives on federal charges.  Synthes is a medical device maker, and according to the indictment, they improperly marketed it's bone filler, Norial XR for unapproved uses.  The company is charged with conducting an unauthorized clinical trial, using the bone filler in two types of back surgery, called vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.  Three people died in the surgeries, though there is no proof that the deaths were caused by the bone filler.  In vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, a cementlike material is injected into a spinal fracture to repair it.  However, the bone filler can escape and create a blood clot in the patient's system.  In 2002, the FDA issued a warning of these risks after receiving reports of injuries and deaths.  Though the FDA approved the bone filler for general bone repair, Synthes was not to promote it for spinal procedures. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to prosecutors, Synthes allowed its salesforce to promote the bone filler for unapproved uses and misled FDA inspectors.  The four indicted Synthes executives are charged with shipping unapproved medical devices.  Those criminal misdemeanor charges carry a potential one year prison term.  Usually the federal government files civil lawsuits for this activity, and it is rare for criminal charges to be filed against company executives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have received a Synthes bone filler product, contact the lawyers at Sheller, P.C., 215-790-7300, to discuss whether you have a potential claim.  Sheller attorneys work aggressively to represent people injured by defective medical devices.  We have successfully obtained compensation for injured people from medical device manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/synthes-executives-indicted-for-improper-marketing.aspx?googleid=265324"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Jamie-Sheller/"&gt;Jamie Sheller&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/synthes-executives-indicted-for-improper-marketing.aspx?googleid=265324</link>
      <source url="http://philadelphia.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/most-commented/">Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer - Medical Devices &amp; Implants - Most Commented</source>
      <category>Medical Devices &amp; Implants</category>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Sheller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>